Tuesday, 13 December 2011

Paranormal activity and The Blair Witch Project

Paranormal activity:
Production:
  • House prepared for a year and re-designed to be filmed in.
  • Shot on a hand-held camera.
  • Actors not given scripts, they were retroscripting, knowing the outline of the story.
Distribution:
  • Sent to horror film festivals where it impressed
  • Tested in cinemas where people walked out due to fear
  • Paramount bought the company who'd acquired rights to distribute the film and sent it out to a wider market
Marketing:
  • After being shown at festivals, people were asked to vote where it would next be shown
  • The more votes on the website, the further wide it was shown. 
Exhibited:
  • Film festivals-directly at target audience
  • Small number of cinemas where tagret audience were situated
  • Voted places
  • Nationwide (USA)
  • Global
The Blair Witch Project:
Production:
  • Advertising in a magazine where improvisational actors were requested-a magazine they'd read.
  • Stooges unknown to cast and general public featured in the film
  • Actors deprived of food
Distribution:
  • Three universities funded distribution and Artisan bought the film and sold it
  • Screened at a film festival then screened wordlwide
Marketing:
  • Suggested as a real event over the internet

Tuesday, 29 November 2011

Bullet Boy marketing

festival screenings at the end of 2004.
it had accumulated both word-of-mouth and press coverage in the news pages due to being about tackling gun crime in hackney.
advertised in all of the national daily newspapers that allocate significant space to film reviews, plus two tabloids, newspapers with a black perspective, a selective London Underground campaign and extensive use of radio stations with a concentration on R 'n' B and Garage, the musical forms with which Walters is associated.
carefully selected urban multiplexes.
http://www.totalfilm.com/reviews/cinema/bullet-boy

Tuesday, 22 November 2011

Gladiator

http://www.dreamworks.com/gladiator/
 www.moviemistakes.com/film541 Lots of mistakes found in the film, listed with what and where they are.

Box Office

Budget:

$103,000,000 (estimated)

Opening Weekend:

$34,819,017 (USA) (7 May 2000) (2938 Screens)

Gross:

$258,264,745 (Worldwide) (except USA) 
Synopsis
 
 

Friday, 11 November 2011

Bullet Boy

Director: Saul Dibb
Distributed by Verve
Produced by: BBC, Film Council, Shine.
Funded by the National Lottery

Tuesday, 8 November 2011

Old Hollywood

Old Hollywood had 5 main studios. They each owned their own sets, locations, actors and film crew. Everything was under a long term contract, meaning the studio always had work.
There were around 6-8 films made every year by each director, far more than there are now. These would then be distributed all over the world to cinemas which, again, would be owned by the studios meaning that these cinemas all showed the same type of film since the crew would specialize in the genre the company was known for.
The audience would be able to easily decide on which genre they liked, and go to the cinema which showed that genre. Their preferences would be well catered for at the cinemas belonging to studios which were famous for their favourite genres. EG RKO's cinemas would show RKO's horror films.
All films however, would be very predictable, as sets and actors would be re-used.

Friday, 21 October 2011

Producer unit system

Near the end of the one-reel era, the director-unit system gave way to the producer-unit system. While studios maintained director-led units, many of the managerial tasks, particularly in the pre-production phase, that had traditionally fallen to directors were assumed by central managers. Thomas Ince of Triangle stopped directing in the early 1910s and soon became one of the industry's first – and most powerful – central producers, running a 43-acre studio facility with over 1,000 employees. This system was closely linked to the rise of feature filmmaking, which required significantly greater investments per film and therefore much more detailed planning and managerial oversight than in the one-reel era.
This control over production was accomplished primarily through the continuity script – essentially a complete blueprint for and record of a film shoot. The continuity script featured many of the same elements as the earlier scenario script, but in significantly greater detail. It also contained shooting dates, highly detailed description of actions, footage estimations for each shot, complete budgetary data, and information on release prints and distribution. The evolution of the continuity script is concurrent with a set of profound changes in film style, as filmmakers began to explore in earnest scene dissection (i.e., the division of scenes into multiple shots). This emerging mode of representation required careful attention to the proper matching of positions and movements across shots – and the most effective way to do so was by planning every detail in advance. The continuity script led to a further division of labor within scenario departments, with "creative" personnel responsible for developing film stories and continuity experts responsible for converting them into detailed scripts.

Tuesday, 18 October 2011

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6S6IJWilpx4

DVD cover analysis

 The name of Leonardo DiCaprio is the very first thing in the top left corner of the dvd cover. His name is here because he is the star and seeing his name will make his fans want to buy the dvd and watch the film.

Claire Danes was also a star at the time, because of her tv series, so seeing her name on the box would be appealing to the teenage target audience that she already had in her fanbase.

The close up of the two's faces right against each other shows that it is a romance, as the tight framing shows how close they are, representing their love for each other.

The gun, with an image of Mary and the cross attached to it suggests it may be set in a religious area, in this case the Hispanic area of LA.

Friday, 7 October 2011

Review of a film



The clip begins with silence, just watching the dog, from a long shot. This is a good way to observe the dog’s seemingly natural behaviour.  It sets a serene and calm atmosphere within the scene, allowing the audience a moment to relax, yet building suspense within them, anticipating what might happen next. It is a key element of the whole film, and done here very well.
The still camera continues this long shot for a very long time, watching the dog’s twitches, suggesting something may be a little amiss, but there is nothing obvious, so suspense and tension is continued to be created.
There is a cut away to the living room, again a long shot, where the camera focuses on the opening of a door. All of this is done in silence to build the tension and fear within the scene.
Cutting to the bedroom and the living room alternately, showing the dog getting more and more worried at what appears to be nothing, will strike more fear into the audience. Dogs are supposedly better at sensing things than humans, so the fact a dog has sensed something worthy of leaving the room to investigate will make the audience fearful since they have no idea what to anticipate. They will fear the unknown.
The dog’s barking shows it is in distress. Even though this is done off camera, the off-screen diagetic sound scares the audience, making them wonder what on earth it could be that the dog is so fearful of.
The handheld camera held by the girl is unsteady to show it as a home-movie. Also, the girl’s trembling voice is another off-screen diagetic sound. These things show panic within the character as she has no explanation as to what happened, just like the audience, who can also be scared by not knowing what’s gone on.
There is a long scene, again a long shot, with the girl on the stairs, she is obviously distressed and the lack of anything around her suggests she is lonely and feels weak and small, as she appears to be on screen.

Wednesday, 5 October 2011

MGM label research


History:
  • After gradually being built through purchasing higher quality workers, MGM surpassed Universal Studios as the largest studio in Hollywood, a distinction it would maintain for over 30 years. 
  • Fox tried to merge with MGM but the deal fell through.

Golden Age:

After a huge fade for a number of decades, MGM became big again with the James Bond franchise. It also distributed pictures internationally through 20th century fox, rather than the older method through UIP which was accused of being illegal.

 
MGM has now been taken over and does not produce any films of its own right, though it is still in business.

Tuesday, 27 September 2011

Star Powerpoint

Summarize Brad Pitt PowerPoint

Stars sell products and advertise business. Add examples here
Many hair shampoos are advertized by actresses, for example Penelope Cruz with loreal. A lot of other cosmetics companies advertize using ators and actresses, like Avon with Reese Witherspoon, and Orlando Bloom with Hugo Boss.

Do stars influence the way ordinary people live? Add examples here

Tuesday, 20 September 2011

Top 100 box office stars of all time

All Time Top 100 Stars at the Box Office
Name Movies Total Box Office Average
1 Frank Welker 96 $6,279,159,825 $65,407,915
2 Samuel L. Jackson 85 $5,282,375,720 $62,145,597
3 Tom Hanks 44 $4,449,980,530 $101,135,921
4 John Ratzenberger 32 $3,912,466,989 $122,264,593
5 Harrison Ford 41 $3,784,518,909 $92,305,339
6 Eddie Murphy 36 $3,710,539,654 $103,070,546
7 Warwick Davis 18 $3,512,651,328 $195,147,296
8 Tom Cruise 35 $3,355,871,014 $95,882,029
9 Hugo Weaving 22 $3,353,109,744 $152,414,079
10 Alan Rickman 32 $3,332,856,277 $104,151,759
11 Jack Angel 28 $3,317,891,129 $118,496,112
12 Morgan Freeman 52 $3,279,026,218 $63,058,197
13 James Earl Jones 47 $3,261,150,733 $69,386,186
14 Robin Williams 58 $3,234,383,008 $55,765,224
15 Gary Oldman 34 $3,233,669,787 $95,107,935
16 Bruce Willis 62 $3,219,308,730 $51,924,334
17 Robbie Coltrane 33 $3,167,825,183 $95,994,703
18 Johnny Depp 47 $3,118,037,105 $66,341,215
19 Stan Lee 16 $3,071,203,283 $191,950,205
20 Mickie McGowan 25 $3,011,117,406 $120,444,696


Here are the top 20 stars in film.





Tuesday, 13 September 2011

Stars, past and present

Shirley Temple:
Box office success-
  1. Stand Up and Cheer! became Temple's breakthrough film
  2. success continued with a loan-out to Paramount for Little Miss Marker
  3.  Bright Eyes was released. It was the first feature film crafted specifically for Shirley's talents
Attached to Twentieth Century Fox label.

Johnny Depp:
Box office success-
  1. Edward scissor hands was nominated for a golden globe. (best actor)
  2. Received 47 other award nominations.
  3. Also received 12 awards.

Created his own production company;
Infinitum Nihil